• Ciesielski, M. & Stereńczak, K. What do we expect from forests? The European view of public demands. J. Environ. Manage. 209, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.032 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pröbstl, U., Wirth, V., Elands, B. H. M. & Bell, S. Management of Recreation and Nature Based Tourism in European Forests. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03145-8 (Springer, 2010).

  • Tyrväinen, L., Pauleit, S., Seeland, K. & de Vries, S. Benefits and Uses of Urban Forests and Trees. In Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book, (eds. Konijnendijk, C. C. et al.) 81–114 (Springer, 2005).

  • Nastran, M., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š. & Cvejić, R. Stakeholders’ perceptions on the role of urban green infrastructure in providing ecosystem services for human Well-Being. Land 11, 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020299 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegetschweiler, K. T., Wartmann, F. M., Dubernet, I., Fischer, C. & Hunziker, M. Urban forest usage and perception of ecosystem services – A comparison between teenagers and adults. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 74, 127624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127624 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vas, K. Birding blogs as indicators of birdwatcher characteristics and trip preferences: implications for birding destination planning and development. J. Destination Mark. Manage. 6, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.02.001 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Litleskare, S. & Calogiuri, G. Nature visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: facilitators, motives, and associations with sociodemographic characteristics. Front. Public. Health. 11, 1138915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138915 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. K., Ndiaye, H., Daniels, M. & Ahmed, F. Lockdown, slow down: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity-an observational study. Open. Heart. 8 https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001600 (2021).

  • Weinbrenner, H. et al. The forest has become our new living Room – The critical importance of urban forests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Glob Change. 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.672909 (2021).

  • Gołos, P. The recreational functions of Warsaw’s urban and suburban forests. For. Res. Papers. 74 https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2013-0007 (2013).

  • Łaszkiewicz, E., Kronenberg, J., Mohamed, A. A., Roitsch, D. & de Vreese, R. Who does not use urban green spaces and why? Insights from a comparative study of thirty-three European countries. Landsc. Urban Plann. 239, 104866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104866 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. Design for Outdoor Recreation 2nd edn (Routledge, 2008).

  • Jenkins, J. & Pigram, J. Outdoor Recreation Management (Taylor & Francis, 2005).

  • Bielinis, E., Bielinis, L., Krupińska-Szeluga, S., Łukowski, A. & Takayama, N. The effects of a short forest recreation program on physiological and psychological relaxation in young Polish adults. Forests 10, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010034 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuyashiki, A., Tabuchi, K., Norikoshi, K., Kobayashi, T. & Oriyama, S. A comparative study of the physiological and psychological effects of forest bathing (Shinrin-yoku) on working age people with and without depressive tendencies. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 24, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-019-0800-1 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, J. & Pretty, J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health?? A Multi-Study analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3947–3955. https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r (2010).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. H. et al. A systematic map of evidence on the contribution of forests to poverty alleviation. Environ. Evid. 8, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-019-0148-4 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 1989).

  • Bierkus, M. Nordic walking jako nowoczesna forma rekreacji ruchowej wpływająca na zdrowie osobnicze i zachowania prozdrowotne = Nordic walking as a modern form of movement recreation affecting an individual’s health and pro-health behaviours.J. Educ. Health Sport. 6(12), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.202289 (2016).

  • Šodková, M., Purwestri, R. C., Riedl, M., Jarský, V. & Hájek, M. Drivers and frequency of forest visits: results of a National survey in the Czech Republic. Forests 11, 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040414 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansil, D., Plecak, C., Taczanowska, K., Jiricka-Pürrer, A. E. & Them Love them, protect Them-Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed People’s perception of urban and suburban green spaces and their conservation targets?? Environ. Manage. 70, 1004–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01721-9 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielski, M., Gołos, P., Stefan, F. & Taczanowska, K. Unveiling the essential role of green spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Forests 15, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020354 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pröbstl-Haider, U., Gugerell, K. & Maruthaveeran, S. Covid-19 and outdoor recreation – Lessons learned? Introduction to the special issue on outdoor recreation and Covid-19: its effects on people, parks and landscapes. J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 41, 100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100583 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielski, M. et al. Navigating complexities in forest visitation modelling: Intersecting environmental, social, and public health factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 49, 100834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2024.100834 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken,. Urban Form and the Sustainability of Urban Systems: Theory and Practice in a Northern Conurbation. In Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, (eds. E. Burton, M. Jenks & K. Williams) 215–228 (2013).

  • Brymer, E., Cuddihy, T. F. & Sharma-Brymer, V. The role of Nature-Based experiences in the development and maintenance of wellness. Asia-Pacific J. Health Sport Phys. Educ. 1, 21–27 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., Montarzino, A. & Travlou, P. Mapping research priorities for green and public urban space in the UK. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 6, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.005 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. D. et al. The nature of the pandemic: exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas. J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 41, 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100498 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, M. D. et al. The outdoor renaissance: assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon outdoor recreation visitation, behaviors, and Decision-Making in new England’s National forests. Soc. Nat. Resour. 35, 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2055247 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N. et al. COVID-19 and protected areas: impacts, conflicts, and possible management solutions. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12800. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12800 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwietering, A., Steinbauer, M., Mangold, M., Sand, M. & Audorff, V. Digitalization of planning and navigating recreational outdoor activities. German J. Exerc. Sport Res. 54, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-023-00927-1 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, J., Porst, F., Leibl, F. & Heurich, M. Digitalisierung in erholungsnutzung und outdoorsport Als Herausforderung – Auf dem Weg zu einem digitalen besuchermanagement in schutzgebieten. Naturschutz Und Landschaftsplanung (NuL) (2022).

  • Arts, K., van der Wal, R. & Adams, W. M. Digital technology and the conservation of nature. Ambio 44, 661–673 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Creany, N. E. et al. Estimating trail use and visitor Spatial distribution using mobile device data: an example from the nature reserve of orange County, California USA. Environ. Challenges. 4, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100171 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, I., Fischer, A., Duckett, D. & van der Wal, R. Information technology and the optimisation of experience – The role of mobile devices and social media in human-nature interactions. Geoforum 122, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.009 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M. & Karvonen, A. Urban planning and the knowledge politics of the smart City. Urban Stud. 61, 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231177688 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gössling, S., Scott, D. & Hall, C. M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: a rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustainable Tourism. 29, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, C., Rossi, S. D., Hernando, A. & Barros, A. Current knowledge and future research directions for the monitoring and management of visitors in recreational and protected areas. J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 21, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2017.11.002 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepillé, R. Forest: the ‘other’ stadium?? Rga https://doi.org/10.4000/Rga.12603 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, M., Schwietering, A., Zink, J., Steinbauer, M. J. & Heurich, M. The digitalization of outdoor recreation: global perspectives on the opportunities and challenges for protected area management. J. Environ. Manage. 352, 120108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120108 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. E. et al. A review of digitalization and sustainability in parks and recreation indicators and thresholds research. J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 39, 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100550 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barocas, S. & Selbst, A. D. Big data’s disparate impact. Calif. Law Rev. 104, 671. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2477899 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. A. Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Palsa, L. & Mertala, P. Contextualizing everyday data literacies: the case of recreational runners. Int. J. Human–Computer Interact. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2241612 (2023).

  • van Dijk, J. The digital divide. Polity, Cambridge, Medford. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24355 (2020).

  • van Dijk, J. A. G. M. Inequalities in the Network Society. In Digital sociology. Critical perspectives, (eds. K. Orton-Johnson & N. PriorPalgrave) Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 105–124. (2013).

  • Niyazova, A. Y. et al. Evaluation of pre-service teachers’ digital skills and ICT competencies in context of the demands of the 21st century. ONLINE J. COMMUN. MEDIA TECHNOL. 13, e202337. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13355 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämmerle, V., Reiner, J., Ruf, E., Lehmann, S. & Misoch, S. Beyond the Digital Divide: Digital Skills and Training Needs of Persons 50+. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE 2022), (eds. M. C. Ziefle, M. Mulvenna & L. Maciaszek) 276–282 (SciTePress – Science and Technology Publications Lda, Setúbal, 2022).

  • Pangrazio, L. & Selwyn, N. Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing Understandings of personal digital data. New. Media Soc. 21, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E. J. & Eynon, R. Digital Natives: where is the evidence? Br. Educational Res. J. 36, 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fareen, J. A. M. Emerging mobile technologies: scope and relevance for Building digital communication capabilities of XYZ generations. IJSSOC 16, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2024.140378 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Luić, L. & Mlakar, M. Stav O digitalnom otisku – prediktor digitalne pismenosti generacije Z. Medijska Istraživanja: znanstveno-stručni Časopis Za Novinarstvo I Medije. 30, 51–78. https://doi.org/10.22572/mi.30.2.3 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Escoda, A. & Rodríguez Conde, M. J. Evaluación de las competencias digitales autopercibidas del profesorado de Educación Primaria en Castilla y León (España). rie 34, 399 https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.2.215121 (2016).

  • Dexter, L. Implications of nature camp, time outdoors, technology, and gender on generation Z’s nature affinity. CLA Journal, 109–143 (2018).

  • Maurer, C. & Lutz, V. The Impact of Digital Divide on Global Tourism: Strategic Implications of Overcoming Communication Gaps Caused by Digital Inequalities. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism : Proceedings of the International Conference in Innsbruck, Austria, January 265–277; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0503-0_22 (2011).

  • Carlisle, S., Ivanov, S. & Dijkmans, C. The digital skills divide: evidence from the European tourism industry. JTF 9, 240–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-07-2020-0114 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M. & de Haan, J. Determinants of 21st-Century skills and 21st-Century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. Sage Open. 10 https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176 (2020).

  • Hargittai, E. Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the net generation. Sociol. Inq. 80, 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghodoosi, B., West, T., Li, Q., Torrisi-Steele, G. & Dey, S. A systematic literature review of data literacy education. J. Bus. Finance Librariansh. 28, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2023.2171552 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, T. & Hoefel, F. ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implication for companies.

  • Brown, G., Schebella, M. F. & Weber, D. Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landsc. Urban Plann. 121, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.006 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F. & Sui, D. Z. Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 102, 571–590 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfi, S., Hall, M. & Strzelecka, M. Gen Z, Tourism, and Sustainable Consumption. The Most Sustainable Generation Ever? (Taylor & Francis, 2023).

  • Neilson, P. A. & Penney, S. H. Next Generation Leadersh. 97802301 (2010).

  • Deloitte. Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2020-millennial-survey.pdf (2020).

  • Arnberger, A., & Eder, R. Are urban visitors’ general preferences for green-spaces similar to their preferences when seeking stress relief? Urban Forestry Urban Green. 14, 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.005 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk, C., Nilsson, K., Randrup, T. & Schipperijn, J. Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27684-X (Springer, 2005).

  • City of Vienna. The Vienna Smart City Strategy. https://smartcity.wien.gv.at/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/05/scwr_klima_2022_web-EN.pdf (2022).

  • Taczanowska, K., Tansil, D., Wilfer, J. & Jiricka-Pürrer, A. The impact of age on People’s use and perception of urban green spaces and their effect on personal health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic—A case study of the metropolitan area of Vienna, Austria. Cities 147, 104798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104798 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnberger, A. & Eder, R. The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 11, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.11.003 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajala, L. et al. Visitor Monitoring in Nature areas – a Manual Based on Experiences from the Nordic and Baltic Countries. TemaNord 2007:534 (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; SE, 2007).

  • van Herzele, A. & Wiedemann, T. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc. Urban Plann. 63, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Randrup, T. B. & Troelsen, J. Influences on the use of urban green space – A case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 9, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducci, M., Janssen, R., Burgers, G. J. & Rotondo, F. Mapping local perceptions for the planning of cultural landscapes. Int. J. E-Planning Res. 12, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.317378 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S. et al. Digital competence scale (DCS). NJDL 19, 126–143. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.19.3.2 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. & Punie, Y. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. 1018–5593; https://doi.org/10.2760/00963 (2017).

  • Roni, S. M. & Djajadikerta, H. G. Data Analysis with SPSS for Survey-based Research (Springer, 2021).

  • Getis, A. & Ord, J. K. The analysis of Spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Anal. 24, 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanorte, A., Nolè, G. & Cillis, G. Application of Getis-Ord correlation index (Gi) for burned area detection improvement in mediterranean ecosystems (Southern Italy and Sardinia) using Sentinel-2 data. Remote Sens. 16, 2943. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162943 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirowzhan, S., Lim, S. & Trinder, J. Enhanced Autocorrelation-Based algorithms for filtering airborne lidar data over urban areas. J. Surv. Eng. 142 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000149 (2016).

  • Kohonen, T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288 (1982).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. Self-Organizing Maps 3rd edn (Springer, 2001).

  • Taczanowska, K. et al. Nature-based tourism or Mass Tourism in Nature? Segmentation of mountain protected area visitors using Self-Organizing maps (SOM). Sustainability 11, 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051314 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural Netw. 37, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.018 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín Guerrero, J. D. et al. Self-Organising maps: A new way to screen the level of satisfaction of dialysis patients. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 8793–8798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.001 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. Z. Tourist market segmentation with linear and non-linear techniques. Tour. Manag. 25, 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.07.004 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazanec, J. A. Image measurement with self-organizing maps: A tentative application to Austrian tour operators. Tourist Rev. 49, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb058159 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, R. G. Self organising maps for visualising and modelling. Chemistry Central Journal 6 (2), S1 https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-6-S2-S1 (2012).

  • Kohonen, T., Oja, E., Simula, O., Visa, A. & Kangas, J. Engineering applications of the self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE. 84, 1358–1384. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.537105 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., Vivanco, M. & Toca-Herrera, J. L. Application of self-organizing maps to AFM-based viscoelastic characterization of breast cancer cell mechanics. Sci. Rep. 13, 3087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30156-3 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, G., Chattopadhyay, M. & Gupta, S. A. Comparison of Self-organising maps and principal components analysis. Int. J. Market Res. 58, 815–834. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-039 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieh, S. L. & Liao, I. E. A new approach for data clustering and visualization using self-organizing maps. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 11924–11933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.181 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. et al. Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 11, 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846729 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrens, R. & Buydens, L. M. C. Self- and Super-organizing maps in R: the Kohonen package. J. Stat. Soft. 21, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v021.i05 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee, S. Y. Age-related digital disparities, functional limitations, and social isolation: unraveling the grey digital divide between baby boomers and the silent generation in senior living facilities. Aging Ment. Health. 28, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2023.2233454 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaragoza-Sáez, P., Marco-Lajara, B. & Ubeda-Garcia, M. Digital skills in tourism. A study from the next tourism generation (NTG) alliance. MBE 26, 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-11-2020-0151 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E., Walejko, G. & THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE. Content creation and sharing in the digital age1. Inform. Communication Soc. 11, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. Potential biases in big data: omitted voices on social media. Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 38, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788322 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gursoy, D. & Gavcar, E. International leisure tourists’ involvement profile. Annals Tourism Res. 30, 906–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(03)00059-8 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, T., Nogueira Mendes, R., Farías-Torbidoni, E. I. & Julião, R. P. & Da Pereira Silva, C. Volunteered geographical information and recreational uses within metropolitan and rural contexts. IJGI 11, 144 ; (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020144

  • Wood, B. E. What is a social inquiry? Crafting questions that lead to deeper knowledge about society and citizenship. Set, 20–28; https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0334 (2013).

  • Loosen, A., Capdevila, T. V., Pigeon, K., Wright, P. & Jacob, A. L. Understanding the role of traditional and user-created recreation data in the cumulative footprint of recreation. J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 44, 100615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2023.100615 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, T. K. & Wolfram, G. Digital Connection. Die Bessere Customer Journey Mit Smarten Technologien – Strategie Und Praxisbeispiele. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18759-0 (Springer, 2018).

  • Tenkanen, H. et al. Instagram, Flickr, or Twitter: assessing the usability of social media data for visitor monitoring in protected areas. Sci. Rep. 7, 17615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18007-4 (2017).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer-Chenoll, M. T., Taczanowska, K., Serra-Añó, P., Toca-Herrera, J. L. & González, L. M. National Parks in Twitter: A German-speaking perspective. https://doi.org/10.1553/eco.mont-15-1s25 (2023).

  • Taczanowska, K. et al. Lobbying in social media as a new source of survey bias. J. Outdoor Recreation Tourism. 44, 100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2023.100689 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbisiero, F., Monaco, S. & Ruspini, E. (eds) Millennials, Generation Z and the Future of Tourism. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845417628 (Channel View Publications, 2022).

  • Haddouche, H. & Salomone, C. Generation Z and the tourist experience: tourist stories and use of social networks. Journal Tourism Futures 4, 69–79 ; https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-12-2017-0059

  • Vojvodić, K. Generation Z in brick-and-mortar stories: a review and research propositions. Poslovna Izvrsnost. 13, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.22598/pi-be/2019.13.1.105 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, D., van Kraalingen, I. & Thomas, G. J. The impact of technology on presence in outdoor education. J. Experiential Educ. 47, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231202452 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S. Adaptive tourism areas in times of change. Annals Tourism Res. 87, 102987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102987 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Korcz, N. et al. Influence of informal education in the forest stand redevelopment area on the psychological restoration of working adults. Forests 12, 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12080993 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, N. K. F., Yeung, S. & Cheung, C. A critical investigation of the use and effectiveness of interpretive services. Asia Pac. J. Tourism Res. 16, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2011.556336 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, L., Taczanowska, K., Porst, F. & Arnberger, A. Evaluation of GNSS-based volunteered geographic information for assessing visitor Spatial distribution within protected areas: A case study of the Bavarian forest National park, Germany. Appl. Geogr. 150, 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102825 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistik Austria. Statistik Austria Open.data. https://data.statistik.gv.at/web/meta.jsp?dataset=OGD_bevstandjbab2002_BevStand_2024 (2024).

  • Couper, M. P., Kapteyn, A., Schonlau, M. & Winter, J. Noncoverage and nonresponse in an internet survey. Soc. Sci. Res. 36, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.10.002 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, M. et al. Sample composition discrepancies in different stages of a Probability-based online panel. Field Methods. 25, 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12472951 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, K., Grün, B., Dolnicar, S. PC, Phone or Tablet? Use, Preference and Completion Rates for Web Surveys. Int. J. Market Res. 59, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-049 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmann, K. & Blank, G. Rethinking digital skills in the era of compulsory computing: methods, measurement, policy and theory. Inform. Communication Soc. 24, 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1874475 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevodnik, K., Trkman, M., Grošelj, D., Bartol, J. & Petrovčič, A. An assessment of the structural validity and measurement invariance of the Web-Use skills scale for aging internet users. Cyberpsychology Behav. Social Netw. 25, 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0023 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. Survey measures of Web-Oriented digital literacy. Social Sci. Comput. Rev. 23, 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305275911 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattar, J., Ramos, D. K. & Lucas, M. R. DigComp-Based digital competence assessment tools: literature review and instrument analysis. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27, 10843–10867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11034-3 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara, I. et al. Understanding factors related to Chilean students’ digital skills: A mixed methods analysis. Comput. Educ. 88, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.016 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jashari, X., Fetaji, B., Nussbaumer, A. & Gütl, C. Assessing digital skills and competencies for different groups and devising a conceptual model to support teaching and training. Cross Real. Data Sci. Eng. – Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Remote Eng. Virtual Instrum. REV. 2020: Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Remote Eng. Virtual Instrum. 1231. 982–995 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_82 (2021).

  • Desnenko, S., Pakhomova, T., Starostina, S. & Tokareva, J. Gamification in the formation of digital skills of future teachers. E3S Web Conf. 273, 12118. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312118 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesanto, J. & Alhoniemi, E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 11, 586–600. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.846731 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link