• Santos, S. C., Liguori, E. W. & Garvey, E. How digitalization reinvented entrepreneurial resilience during COVID-19. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 189, 122398 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Do, H. et al. Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism. J. Bus. Res. 141, 808–821 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, R. E., Dwyer, S. M. & Koch, H. Upgrading adaptation: How digital transformation promotes organizational resilience. Strateg. Entrep. J. 18(1), 128–164 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrales-Estrada, A. M. et al. Sustainability and resilience organizational capabilities to enhance business continuity management: A literature review. Sustainability 13(15), 8196 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, S. S., Rai, S. & Singh, N. K. Organizational resilience and social-economic sustainability: COVID-19 perspective. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 12006–12023 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prayag, G., Muskat, B. & Dassanayake, C. Leading for resilience: Fostering employee and organizational resilience in tourism firms. J. Travel Res. 63(3), 659–680 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Moreno, A., Martín-Rojas, R. & García-Morales, V. J. The key role of innovation and organizational resilience in improving business performance: A mixed-methods approach. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 77, 102777 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iftikhar, A., Purvis, L. & Giannoccaro, I. A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience. J. Bus. Res. 135, 408–425 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, B. H. Jr. et al. Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. J. Manag. 46(6), 1029–1062 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, F. F. & Montes, J. S. Building organizational resilience. Harv. Bus. Rev. 98(6), 47–52 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, W. L., Lee, M. & Lim, W. S. The relational activation of resilience model: How leadership activates resilience in an organizational crisis. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 25(3), 136–147 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q. Digital leadership: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Eur. J. Innovat. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-07-2023-0522/full/html (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E. et al. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(3), 499 (2001).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, P., Demerouti, E. & Schaufeli, W. B. Crafting the change: The role of employee job crafting behaviors for successful organizational change. J. Manag. 44(5), 1766–1792 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A. & Dutton, J. E. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26(2), 179–201 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. & Derks, D. Development and validation of the job crafting scale. J. Vocat. Behav. 80(1), 173–186 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. et al. Digital leadership and employee creativity: The role of employee job crafting and person-organization fit. Front. Psychol. 13, 827057 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellis, P., Cunial, M. & Trabucchi, D. Mastering hybrid worlds through digital leadership: The role of agility in fostering innovation. Bus. Horiz. 67(4), 369–380 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez, J. et al. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Inf. Manag. 59(2), 103590 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, G. C. et al. How digital leadership is (n’t) different. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 60(3), 34–39 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M. et al. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 55(2), 1 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, P. F. & Campion, M. A. A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Acad. Manag. J. 61(2), 499–522 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. & Simons, R. Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work: An empirical study. J. Knowl. Manag. 6(5), 420–433 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, A. M., Negash, Y. T. & Hanum, F. An assessment of barriers to digital transformation in circular construction: An application of stakeholder theory. Ain Shams Eng. J. 15(7), 102787 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langfred, C. W. & Moye, N. A. Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(6), 934 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. et al. Fortune favours the digitally mature: The impact of digital maturity on the organisational resilience of SME retailers during COVID-19. Int. J. Retail Distribut. Manag. 50(8/9), 1182–1204 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad, J. & Martín-Rojas, R. Enhancing social responsibility and resilience through entrepreneurship and digital environment. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 31(3), 1688–1704 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. et al. Leadership mindsets, cultural norms and organizational resilience in China: The moderating effect of supportive human resource practices. Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 29(1), 248–265 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolli, L. & Savicki, V. Information system organizational resilience. Omega 31(3), 227–233 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velyako, V. & Musa, S. The relationship between digital organizational culture, digital capability, digital innovation, organizational resilience, and competitive advantage. J. Knowl. Econ. 15(3), 11956–11975 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, C. & Ribiere, V. Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation 102, 102217 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, K. et al. The Digital Path to Business Resilience (Boston Consulting Group Report, 2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, G. et al. The digital advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. MITSloan Manag. Capgemini Consult. MA 2, 2–23 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, G., Bonnet, D. & McAfee, A. Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation (Harvard Business Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeike, S. et al. Digital leadership skills and associations with psychological well-being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(14), 2628 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, T. J., Schuster, T. & Lehmann, C. Leadership’s long arm: The positive influence of digital leadership on managing technology-driven change over a strengthened service innovation capacity. Front. Psychol. 14, 988808 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus, S. et al. Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Nat. Hazard. Rev. 9(2), 81–90 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, K. P., et al. Strategic leadership attributes for adopting digital technology and ensuring organisational resilience, in Digital Transformation, Strategic Resilience, Cyber Security and Risk Management 159–173 (Emerald Publishing Limited, 2023).

  • Tigre, F. B., Curado, C. & Henriques, P. L. Digital leadership: A bibliometric analysis. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 30(1), 40–70 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. et al. Digital workplace and organization performance: Moderating role of digital leadership capability. J. Innov. Knowl. 8(1), 100334 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann, C. M., Boen, F. & Fransen, K. The power of empowerment: Predictors and benefits of shared leadership in organizations. Front. Psychol. 11, 582894 (2020).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahou, K. & Hacini, I. Successful employee empowerment: Major determinants in the Jordanian context. Eur. J. Bus. Econ. 11(21), 49–68 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hur, W.-M., Shin, Y. & Chung, J.-H. Is insomnia detrimental to proactive service performance and customer-directed helping? Mediation of employee resilience and moderation of job crafting. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 81, 103955 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyama, H. et al. Job crafting among school principals before and during COVID-19: Investigating the associations with work-related well-being and personal resources using variable-and person-oriented approaches. Eur. Manag. J. 42(6), 933–943 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S., Gigliotti, R. A. & Dwyer, M. Role conflict, job crafting, stress and resilience among nurses during COVID-19. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 30(3), 234–243 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahay, S. & Dwyer, M. Emergent organizing in crisis: US nurses’ sensemaking and job crafting during COVID-19. Manag. Commun. Q. 35(4), 546–571 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuvaas, B., Buch, R. & Dysvik, A. Performance management: Perceiving goals as invariable and implications for perceived job autonomy and work performance. Hum. Resour. Manage. 55(3), 401–412 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp, J. et al. Psychological safety, job crafting, and employability: A comparison between permanent and temporary workers. Front. Psychol. 10, 974 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobaih, A. E. E. et al. Responses to COVID-19: The role of performance in the relationship between small hospitality enterprises’ resilience and sustainable tourism development. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 94, 102824 (2021).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Petter, S., Straub, D. & Rai, A. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research 623–656 (MIS Quarterly, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.-C. & Lin, C.-P. Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: The mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 140, 22–32 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295(2), 295–336 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. D. Partial Least Squares. Regression and Structural Equation Models (Statistical Publishing Associates, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A. & John, R. Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology–enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inf. Syst. Res. 16(1), 9–27 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B. & Gaskin, J. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 57(2), 123–146 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., How to write up and report PLS analyses. in Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications 655–690 (Springer, 2009).

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115–135 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Purwanto, A. & Sudargini, Y. Partial least squares structural squation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis for social and management research: A literature review. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Res. 2(4), 114–123 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. & Reno, R. R. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12(4), 531–544 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z.-Y. et al. Digital leadership and deviant innovation: The roles of innovation self-efficacy and employee ambitions. Curr. Psychol. 43(26), 22226–22237 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehnlein, P. & Baum, M. Does job crafting always lead to employee well-being and performance? Meta-analytical evidence on the moderating role of societal culture. Int. J. Human Resource Manag. 33(4), 647–685 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership Vol. 2 (Wiley, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. & Beehr, T. A. Can empowering leaders affect subordinates’ well-being and careers because they encourage subordinates’ job crafting behaviors?. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 25(2), 184–196 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavik, A., Bavik, Y. L. & Tang, P. M. Servant leadership, employee job crafting, and citizenship behaviors: A cross-level investigation. Cornell Hosp. Q. 58(4), 364–373 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnlein, P. & Baum, M. Does job crafting always lead to employee well-being and performance? Meta-analytical evidence on the oderating role of societal culture. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 33(4), 647–685 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Source link